Vietnam, Government of — Moody’s upgrades Vietnam’s rating to Ba2, outlook changed to stable

Spread the love

Rating Action: Moody’s upgrades Vietnam’s rating to Ba2, outlook changed to stableGlobal Credit Research – 06 Sep 2022Singapore, September 06, 2022 — Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) has today upgraded the Government of Vietnam’s long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings to Ba2 from Ba3 and changed the outlook to stable from positive.The upgrade to Ba2 reflects Vietnam’s growing economic strengths relative to peers and greater resilience to external macroeconomic shocks that are indicative of improved policy effectiveness, and which Moody’s expects to continue as the economy benefits from supply chain reconfiguration, export diversification and continued inbound investment in manufacturing. The rating also reflects a sounder fiscal footing backed by contained borrowing costs, a conservative approach to fiscal policy and improved government liquidity, driven by the ongoing transition from external concessional borrowing toward longer-dated, low-cost domestic market financing.The stable outlook reflects a balance of risks to the rating. On the positive front, Moody’s expects continued improvements in economic competitiveness to support rising incomes and advancements in fiscal prudence demonstrated through the execution of a more systematic, long-term debt management strategy and an increasing emphasis in fiscal policy on long-term challenges, including improving worker productivity and mitigating against physical climate risks. On the downside, the relatively low capitalization levels of state-owned banks coupled with high domestic credit growth and potential risks from the real estate sector pose risks to the real economy in the event of a shock. Uncertainties relating to regional and global geopolitical tensions, higher imported input prices and uncertain growth prospects in Vietnam’s key trading partners may also pose limits to external surpluses for Vietnam’s trade-reliant economy.Concurrent to today’s action, Vietnam’s local- and foreign-currency ceilings are raised by one notch to Baa2 from Baa3 and Ba1 from Ba2, respectively. The Baa2 local currency ceiling, three notches above the sovereign rating, reflects relatively opaque government decision-making and the significant, though shrinking, government footprint in the economy, balanced by moderate political risks and low external imbalances. The foreign currency ceiling at Ba1, two notches below the local-currency ceiling, reflects existing constraints to capital flows that point to possible transfer and convertibility restrictions being imposed at times of perceived need.RATINGS RATIONALERATIONALE FOR THE Ba2 RATINGINCREASING COMPETITIVENESS AND INTEGRATION WITH GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS SUPPORT RISING ECONOMIC STRENGTHThe increasing demand for Vietnamese exports through the coronavirus pandemic underpins the growing competitiveness of Vietnam’s manufacturing sector, which has outperformed regional peers in the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI) and has driven a rapid rise in per capita income. Trade tensions between the US and China, as well as the supply chain disruptions due to the waves of lockdowns within China, have accelerated manufacturing investment in Vietnam given the similarity of Vietnam’s exports compared with China’s among Asia-Pacific economies, along with an ample supply of relatively low-cost labor.Moody’s expects Vietnam’s centrality to multiple regional and bilateral trade agreements to affirm its entrenched position in global value chains. Vietnam is a party to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and bilateral Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with Korea, and more recently, with the European Union and the United Kingdom. These trade agreements will strengthen Vietnam’s competitive position in lower-value products such as footwear, garments and agricultural goods, while placing it firmly in higher-value-added regional tech supply chains for smartphones, computers and other electronic products.Structural risks to this economic trajectory may emerge over the next 5-10 years as the existing stock of port, airport, electricity and railways infrastructure and the working age population, which will peak around 2035, may be insufficient to absorb large-scale shifts in supply chains to Vietnam from China and other higher-wage locations of production. Moody’s expects the authorities to seek to address these challenges through investment in education and worker training to support higher productivity and employment in higher value-added activities, while targeting inflows of FDI into sectors and activities that lead to greater direct spillovers to domestic suppliers.FISCAL CAPACITY WILL IMPROVE, SUPPORTED BY PRUDENT DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND INCREASED FOCUS ON LONG-TERM RISKSFiscal policy effectiveness has improved, including a greater emphasis on medium-term budget planning and the deepening of domestic, low-cost financing sources. The National Assembly has also lowered the statutory public debt ceiling to 60% of GDP from 65% to better anchor debt levels while preserving fiscal flexibility amid the ongoing economic recovery. However, transparency regarding contingent liabilities remains limited, including the size and financial performance of large state-owned enterprises, and delays in the execution of the government’s large public investment budget are credit constraints.Despite below-potential growth in 2021, Vietnam’s fiscal performance was stable, recording a 3.4% of GDP deficit with revenue collection exceeding its target by 16.8% – partially due to companies’ lower than expected uptake of stimulus support measures such as corporate income tax deferrals. Vietnam’s government debt burden registered a moderate rise to 39.1% of GDP in 2021, higher than previously forecast but comparable to levels in previous years and below the statutory public debt ceiling.For 2022, Moody’s expects the fiscal deficit to be marginally higher at around 3.8%, in line with the Ba-rated median, as the authorities implement the Socio-Economic Recovery and Development Program, valued at VND350 trillion ($14.9 billion, or 4.1% of 2021 estimated GDP). The program cuts the value-added tax for most sectors, provides interest rate subsidies on loans to businesses and allocates additional expenditure toward public investment in transport, IT infrastructure, prevention of riverbank and coastal erosion and other climate change adaptation projects. Moody’s expects Vietnam’s fiscal deficit to consolidate to around 2.7% by 2025, with the government debt burden set to decline to around 37%.Fiscal strength will be further supported by improved government liquidity and debt affordability, which has been well-anchored by lower domestic borrowing costs brought on by capital inflows and high domestic savings that have allowed the government to increasingly source budget financing from domestic institutional investors at longer tenors. The average issuance tenor of government bonds is now nearly 14 years, bringing the average term to maturity on all outstanding domestic government bonds to more than 9 years from 2.4 years in 2013.The authorities are now embedding measures in fiscal policy planning to address long-term challenges such as environmental risks, which likely signal a significant increase in capital expenditure. Moody’s assesses that the country has highly negative credit exposure to physical climate risks including coastal flooding, droughts and water management risks related to the impact of industrial pollution, urbanization and hydroelectric development on the Mekong River, which supports the bulk of Vietnam’s rice and aquaculture output. However, there is greater government policy focus on these challenges. For example, the government’s National Climate Change Strategy to 2050 will involve multi-ministerial efforts to reduce Vietnam’s greenhouse gas emissions by addressing energy consumption, forestry and waste management.RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOKThe stable outlook reflects a balance of risks. On the positive side, upward credit pressures are driven by expected improvements in economic strength and fiscal fundamentals that illustrate gains in policy effectiveness and further integration with global value chains. However, downward pressures may emerge from external uncertainties related to slowing global growth and risks in Vietnam’s financial system that may weigh on economic potential.Specifically, Moody’s assesses that the institutional capacity and frameworks to manage complex emerging risks, such as financial stability in the nascent corporate bond market, are still evolving. Financial system risks are amplified by Moody’s assessment that capitalization of Vietnam’s banking system remains relatively low, particularly given uncertainties from exposures to the household and real estate sectors and a continued rise in corporate leverage. Domestic credit and domestic banking system assets as a percent of GDP have increased further to 124% and 187% in 2021 respectively, among the highest levels among rated sovereigns in the Ba and Baa tiers. Although the government has been restrained in recent years in its provision of direct capital support to state-owned banks, the impact of a banking system credit event would have significant indirect effects on the economy given the importance of bank lending to domestic investment, and would undermine foreign investor confidence in the execution of macroeconomic policies.This reflects gaps in institutions and governance strength that will take to time to address, including the limited transparency of regulatory and economic policies and fiscal accounts, and pending improvements to the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises that would lead to their restructuring or divestment.Although Moody’s expects Vietnam’s economy to continue to benefit from FDI inflows and supply chain shifts in the Asia Pacific region, Vietnam’s structural balance of payments surpluses may narrow over the next two years due to higher commodity prices, slower growth in Vietnam’s largest export markets, rising domestic investment needs, and higher input costs owing to occasional supply chain disruptions.ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE CONSIDERATIONSVietnam’s ESG credit impact score is highly negative (CIS-4 credit impact score), driven primarily by highly negative environmental exposures including coastal flooding and water management risk that may incur losses in major economic centers and increase adaptation costs over time. Social risk exposure balances demographic advantages and robust provision of basic public services such as healthcare against wide skills and income gaps between the rural and urban populations. Governance limitations including weak legislative and executive institutions constrain policy effectiveness and transparency, but have been increasingly balanced by strengthened fiscal and monetary policy effectiveness that has helped to increase Vietnam’s resilience to shocks.Vietnam’s exposure to environmental risk is highly negative (E-4 issuer profile score), largely reflecting physical climate risks from potentially adverse exposure to coastal flooding and heat waves. Over time, rising sea levels and increasing frequency of severe climate change-related weather shocks pose risks of significant adaptation and reconstruction costs, while potentially requiring resettlement of some urban populations. The reliance of a substantial part of the population on agriculture for employment exacerbates the potential economic and fiscal impacts of weather-related shocks, such as flooding and storm surges, as well as spillovers from the country’s large and fast-growing manufacturing sector, such as pollution. A highly negative exposure to water management risk also reflects the impacts of upstream hydropower development and pollution to agricultural production in the Mekong River Delta.Vietnam’s social risk exposure is moderately negative (S-3 issuer profile score), balancing Vietnam’s favorable demographics compared with peers with risks to longer-term social stability from the young workforce’s rising expectations of continued improvement in living standards. The expected decline of the working-age population from 2037 is also likely to present challenges to growth and productivity, although government investments in education have the potential to improve worker skills and productivity over time. Relative to peers in terms of level of economic development, Vietnam’s government has prioritized provision of housing, healthcare and education. However, rising levels of economic and social inequality reflect generally weak provision of social services, with high levels of undernourishment and lack of access to clean drinking water.The moderately negative influence of governance (G-3 issuer profile score) on Vietnam’s credit profile incorporates weak legislative and executive institutions that reduce the predictability and transparency of policy, which can hinder investor confidence, while taking into account the recent track record of effective and improved economic policymaking that has supported strong growth and boosted the economy’s global competitiveness.GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 11,534 (2021) (also known as Per Capita Income)Real GDP growth (% change): 2.6% (2021) (also known as GDP Growth)Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 1.8% (2021)Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -3.4% (2021) (also known as Fiscal Balance)Current Account Balance/GDP: -1.1% (2021) (also known as External Balance)External debt/GDP: 35.3% (2021)Economic resiliency: baa3Default history: No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.On 01 September 2022, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Vietnam, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer’s economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer’s institutions and governance strength, have materially increased. The issuer’s governance and/or management, have materially increased. The issuer’s fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has not materially changed.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSFACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADEMoody’s would likely upgrade the rating if there are signs that institutions and governance strength is improving, particularly with monetary policy and regulatory effectiveness. This could come about through the improved supervision of the banking system, reducing contingent liability and financial stability risks. Signs that Vietnam’s economic strength is rising, for instance through its sustained ability to attract FDI and benefit from global supply chain restructuring, including the absorption of higher value-added production with greater linkages to domestic companies, would also indicate upwards rating pressure.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADEMoody’s would consider a downgrade of the rating as a result of a re-emergence of financial instability, leading to higher inflation, a rise in debt-servicing costs or a worsening of the external payments position. Such signs of stress could be related to the reversal of the current stabilization in the debt and deficit trajectory, potentially as a result of a sizable crystallization of contingent risks from either the banking system or state-owned enterprises. Furthermore, evidence that a rise in geopolitical tensions disrupts Vietnam’s access to critical manufacturing inputs or erodes export and FDI competitiveness would be negative for the rating.The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Ratings Methodology published in November 2019 and available at Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on for a copy of this methodology.The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found on ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the issuer/deal page for the respective issuer on any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at least one ESG consideration was material to the credit rating action (s) announced and described above.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on see for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the issuer/deal page on for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Nishad Harshit Majmudar Asst Vice President – Analyst Sovereign Risk Group Moody’s Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd. 71 Robinson Road #05-01/02 Singapore, 068895 Singapore JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Client Service: 852 3551 3077 Marie Diron MD – Sovereign Risk Sovereign Risk Group JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 Client Service: 44 20 7772 5454 Releasing Office: Moody’s Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd. 71 Robinson Road #05-01/02 Singapore, 068895 Singapore JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Client Service: 852 3551 3077 © 2022 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY100,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. ​